Subject: Re: mt(1) doesn't report file number?
To: Hauke Fath <hauke@Espresso.Rhein-Neckar.DE>
From: None <rmcm@compsoft.com.au>
List: port-sparc
Date: 03/22/2002 08:31:50
kern/15993 ( subject says SLR/8, should be SLR/7)

Hauke Fath writes:
 > At 7:33 Uhr +1100 21.3.2002, rmcm@compsoft.com.au wrote:
 > >Matthew Jacob writes:
 > > >
 > > > Interestingly enough, I even *have* such a beast.
 > > >
 > >
 > >Excellent - also, a similar patch (not submitted) is required for
 > >SL/7. I can submit if needed.
 > 
 > ME-TOO.   ;)
 > 
 > Tandberg SLR4, SLR5, SLR60. There are two distinct issues here for QIC
 > derived drives:
 > 
 > o  support for variable block length (which all the SLR models do just
 > fine, and which st(4) does not even read for QIC)
 > 
 > o  1FM@EOT vs. 2FM@EOT (which is relevant for writing more than one file on
 > a tape -- think 'Amanda')
 > 
 > Matthew, if you are interested, I can send you the patches I use at work
 > (and will have to re-apply soon when I upgrade the machine's kernel).
 > 
 > 	hauke
 > 
 > 
 > --
 > /~\  The ASCII Ribbon Campaign        "They that can give up essential liberty
 > \ /    No HTML/RTF in email           to obtain a little temporary safety
 >  X     No Word docs in email          deserve neither liberty nor safety."
 > / \  Respect for open standards                     -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759
 > 

-- 
Rex McMaster