Subject: Re: Does anyone know what the maximum hard drive
To: Andy Ball <ball@cyberspace.org>
From: Geoff Blake <geoff@palaemon.co.uk>
List: port-sparc
Date: 03/16/2002 19:50:23
On Sat, 16 Mar 2002, Andy Ball wrote:
> Hello Geoff!
Hi fellow amateur,
>
> GB> Do you mean that the data is valid at the +ve clock transition
> > and (next byte) at the -ve transition? OK I know that the data
> > is NRZ so I suppose that this is practical, just requires a
> > phase skew between clock & data :-)
>
> Surely there's always going to be one (so the data lines are settled
> before they're clocked into the destination), DTC just uses both edges
> for separate sets of data (I think). It's a technique that seems to be
> cropping up in a number of places (VMEbus etc).
Well without +ve and -ve edge triggered DAV reads, the clock data
(read strobes) has to be twice the data rate.
> GB> That's what cache's are for :-)
>
> To some extent yes, but the read caches can only fill as quickly as
> data can fly under the head.
True, but it has something to do with writes (I have just installed an
new CDRW!)
>
> GB> Can you imagine what such signals do to the RF spectrum :-(
>
> Sadly yes - (73 DE KB9YLW ;-)
I live in an urban area - seems every house has a PC that radiates an
a TV that does likewise!
73 de Geoff
--
Geoff Blake Please reply to: Using Linux on
Chelmsford geoff (a) palaemon . co . uk Intel & NetBSD
Essex UK geoff @ g8gnz . ampr.org on Sun Sparc
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This E-mail and any attachment(s) is strictly confidential and is
intended solely for the addressee(s). If you are not the intended
recipient please notify <postmaster@palaemon.co.uk> and the sender
by return and permanently delete the message. You may not disclose,
forward or copy this E-mail or any attachment(s) to any third party
without the prior consent of the sender.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------