On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, Sean Berry wrote:

# > Wouldn't it be easier just to have more than one partition (!!?)
#
# Unless you don't want to manage more than one partition.

That's an old pointer to an array of functions returning pointers to
arrays of cans of worms that we really don't want to open() right now...

#  Or you want a
# >2GB swap partition starting at the beginning (fastest part) of the disk.

...!  That's a question.  I've seen this reported before; is the
beginning really the fastest (-responding) part of the disk?  I mean, if
you end up running mostly in the middle of the disk, for example, aren't
seek-and-reads to either end going to run at the same speed?

# :)

				--*greywolf;
--
Microsoft:  Living proof that Borg screw Ferengi.