Subject: re: kern.securelevel=1 by default, ipf as LKM
To: Grant Beattie <grant@grunta.com>
From: matthew green <mrg@eterna.com.au>
List: port-sparc
Date: 10/02/2001 11:26:13
   I've wondered this for some time now.. kern.securelevel defaults to 0
   on i386, but 1 on sparc. why is this so?

cuz of xf86 -- sparc isn't useless about X without it.
   
   with ipf built as an LKM,
   
   # ipf -E
   SIOCFRENB: Invalid argument
   
   ipf -E is called from /etc/rc.d/ipfilter.
   
   Obviously once the module is loaded, it's activated, but this could
   cause confusion for people expecting ipf -D to disable it.


hm?  ipf -D doesn't appear to require securelevel set or unset?  i
can see it might not work very nicely at securelevel=2, but that's
something one has to ask or...


.mrg.