Subject: re: kern.securelevel=1 by default, ipf as LKM
To: Grant Beattie <grant@grunta.com>
From: matthew green <mrg@eterna.com.au>
List: port-sparc
Date: 10/02/2001 11:26:13
I've wondered this for some time now.. kern.securelevel defaults to 0
on i386, but 1 on sparc. why is this so?
cuz of xf86 -- sparc isn't useless about X without it.
with ipf built as an LKM,
# ipf -E
SIOCFRENB: Invalid argument
ipf -E is called from /etc/rc.d/ipfilter.
Obviously once the module is loaded, it's activated, but this could
cause confusion for people expecting ipf -D to disable it.
hm? ipf -D doesn't appear to require securelevel set or unset? i
can see it might not work very nicely at securelevel=2, but that's
something one has to ask or...
.mrg.