Subject: Re: physical memory handling changes (heads up)
To: Charles M. Hannum <root@ihack.net>
From: Paul Kranenburg <pk@cs.few.eur.nl>
List: port-sparc
Date: 03/02/2001 01:30:44 
> So, what exactly is the reason for not supporting MSGBUFSIZE, like we
> do on all other platforms?

I'll probably add code to support that soon. The snag is that the
current location of the message buffer (at physical address 0) allow
the messages to survive a reboot, if the machine's PROM permits that
at all.

-pk