In article <el2g0xxiu50.fsf@eniwetok.ihack.net>,
Charles M. Hannum <root@ihack.net> wrote:
>
>David Maxwell <david@fundy.ca> writes:
>
>> Every comment I've seen on the subject said 2.0 == SMP
>
>Really?  Every comment I've seen on the subject from a reputable
>source indicated that there was no plan to change the version
>numbering -- which would mean the next release after 1.5 would be 1.6.
>
>Sounds like the new `core' is making random decisions without
>bothering to tell people...

There have been no discussions about any version numbering schemes after
1.5, or feature set.

christos