Subject: Re: Tape boot work
To: matthew green <mrg@eterna.com.au>
From: None <rdkeys@unity.ncsu.edu>
List: port-sparc
Date: 03/09/1999 11:16:33
> I have two more ram boards that I could put in, but would rather work
> with the 16mb configuration as opposed to a 32mb ram configuration,
> if possible, since the swap size on drv0 is only 20mb. Will that be
> sufficient for a singleuser compile of the kernel and the tapeboot
> bits?
>
> um ...
>
> why aren't you putting that memory in? NetBSD is not like sunos4
> in that you must allocate swap space beyond the size of ram for
> it to be useful. virtual memory is real ram + swap space (or so).
OK, I was not exactly aware of that.
> that extra 16mb will make *all* the difference for the kernel link
> at the end, too... maybe half or more the time it takes :-)
>
> the only reason i can think of to leave the memory out would be
> if you wanted to try out "smaller memory" configurations...
Well, it takes forever to test on bootup with 32M. Anyway, if
the ram wont conflict with the swap size, then I will stuff the
memory boards in.
Thanks
Bob
>