Subject: Re: options "BLINK" in config file for kernel?
To: Ignatios Souvatzis <ignatios@cs.uni-bonn.de>
From: David Maxwell <david@fundy.ca>
List: port-sparc
Date: 01/19/1999 13:24:49
> On Mon, Jan 18, 1999 at 04:55:40PM -0800, Open Carefully -- Contents Under Pressure wrote:
> > Greg A. Woods sez:
> > /*
> >  * Most older suns already have a bank of LEDs, but yes a generic "hardware
> >  * status monitor driver" that could drive these or a parallel port either
> >  * from other driver hooks or user-land would be really cool.  Modern
> >  * computers don't have near enough blink'n lights!
> > 
> > Well agreed.  I had a design for an IPX-sized cube with LOTS of
> > blinkenlights on the front of the box.

Perhaps the reason that some have suggested the lights blink faster as the
load gets higher is that the current range is 1s -> 2s -> 3s -> 4s and
that people don't percieve phenomenon under 1Hz very well. Perhaps a 
suggestion would be to start the blink at a faster rate at load=0, like
10 blinks per second, and get slower as load goes up, 9 per second at load 2
etc... to 1 per second at a load of ten and above.

-- 
David Maxwell, david@vex.net|david@maxwell.net --> Mastery of UNIX, like
mastery of language, offers real freedom. The price of freedom is always dear,
but there's no substitute. Personally, I'd rather pay for my freedom than live
in a bitmapped, pop-up-happy dungeon like NT. - Thomas Scoville