Subject: Re: hmm..
To: None <port-sparc@NetBSD.ORG>
From: Greg Earle <earle@isolar.Tujunga.CA.US>
List: port-sparc
Date: 11/12/1997 18:04:45
Matthew writes:
> someone meantioned here rather recently that the audio interrupts are
> serviced at a higher priority than serial interrupts.  i just noticed
> that in the oct 2 -> oct 19 patch i made last year (the first time
> that *i* noticed extra lossage), i see that the sparc audio driver was
> changed...
> 
[...]
> 
> note that the audio changes are the port to the sun4m.

Pardon me for sticking to 1.2.1 and living in a cave, but "port to the sun4m"?

Details, please ...

	- Greg
	  (Hoping that 1.3 will have a sun4m audio driver for his work SS20/71)