Subject: Re: HyperSPARC woes...
To: Aaron Brown <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: James Graham <email@example.com>
Date: 10/21/1996 12:31:14
# It just seems gross to build a second trap table for each CPU rev, for
# the sake of a single trap. But we certainly use different tables for
So why not initialise the trap table for a "standard" (lowest rev) sun4m,
and then fix only those which need fixing (keep an array which you
then map in as necessary)?
...or is that what you meant when you said "...that's what we do now"?