Subject: Re: State of the Universe (Was: Re: SPARCstation 1 and Archive Viper 150)
To: None <greywolf@captech.com>
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@nas.nasa.gov>
List: port-sparc
Date: 02/15/1996 16:34:07
On Thu, 15 Feb 96 10:13:44 PST
jgraham@defender.VAS.viewlogic.com (James Graham - Systems Anarchist) wrote:
[ I'm not trying to be rude, but I get really frustrated with the "my
SPARCstation SCSI doesn't work" messages that contain flamage and
no other helpful/useful information. ]
> I must concur. My NetBSD/sparc 1+ can't do JACK with a tape drive.
While I sympathize that your tape drive might not be working properly, I
just have to ask "Then why haven't you helped Paul, et al find the bloody
bug?" If any of my SPARC systems had this problem (SS1 and SS2 systems
at work, 4/260 at home; different SCSI controller), then I would
certainly try to help. I'm sure Paul would too. Or anyone else that
might know how to fix it. But, if we can't reproduce the problem on our
end, then it's REALLY difficult to fix it. You could certainly turn on
SCSIDEBUG and/or litter esp.c with printf()s and calls to Debugger() at
the failure points. Also, saying "SS1+" doesn't provide enough info.
There are a b'zillion different flavors of the NCR53c94 (the SCSI chip
used in the SPARCstation). Which revision is it? Note, "ESP100A" might
not be enough. I have an SS1 with an "ESP100A" in it, which has an
Emulex version of the chip, and my SS2 with an "ESP100A" has a genuine
NCR chip.
Simply saying "My NetBSD/sparc 1+ can't do JACK with a tape drive" isn't
going to help anyone solve the problem. Details do.
> Where the _hell_ is the st support? And a properly working 'mt'?
> They've been missing WAY too long! I want to be able to back my
> machine up to a LOCAL tape drive (some of us can't afford more than one
> machine -- should we be punished?).
"st" support and a working "mt" have been here a long time! Because they
fail on some revisions of a SCSI controller chip doesn't mean that
overall support is broken.
So, to re-cap: my tapes/cdroms work, other people's do, too. Yours, and
some others', doesn't. Please help those who are brave enough to hack on
the SCSI code find the bug by providing some useful "mode of failure"
information; you might be surprised at the results.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jason R. Thorpe thorpej@nas.nasa.gov
NASA Ames Research Center Home: 408.866.1912
NAS: M/S 258-6 Work: 415.604.0935
Moffett Field, CA 94035 Pager: 415.428.6939