Subject: Re: Strange libc shared vs. unshared performance
To: Chris G. Demetriou <cgd@alpha.bostic.com>
From: Jason Thorpe <thorpej@cs.orst.edu>
List: port-sparc
Date: 11/12/1994 11:19:58
On Sat, 12 Nov 1994 03:01:40 -0500
"Chris G. Demetriou" <cgd@alpha.bostic.com> wrote:
> if the binary is dynamically linked (i.e. -static is not specified),
> then the dynamic linking must take place! it takes place when
> the program is stated, and it's quite likely that depending on how
> the program is timed, the dynamic link time is included in the program
> runtime.
However, the dynamic link occurs fairly early in execution...
On a side note, -static makes no difference on my hp300 or i486...My
guess is the way gcc 2.4.5 generates code for a sparc...Under SunOS, I've
seen non-trivial performance increases with gcc 2.5 and 2.6.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jason R. Thorpe thorpej@cs.orst.edu 758-2003
Systems Administrator CSWest Room 5 737-5567
CS Dept, Oregon State University http://www.cs.orst.edu/~thorpej
"I brought my BOWLING BALL -- and some DRUGS!"
-- ztp