Port-sh3 archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Re: -current or -netbsd-4 ?

On Sun, Apr 13 2008 - 00:06, Valeriy E. Ushakov wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 20:27:00 +0200, Joel CARNAT wrote:
> > I'm on my way to put my Plextor PX-EH40L (landisk) back in business.
> > Last time I tried (around July 2007) it had quite poor network
> > performance and high CPU load (with big FTP transfer).
> > 
> > Did significant things happened to the source since then (~4.99.22) ?
> > Is it worth installing -current on /landisk or is it the same than
> > -netbsd-4 ?
> Current should be faster, but I'm not sure how much faster.  Current
> on all platforms benefited from Andy's work on SMP &co and also has
> few minor things not pulled up to netbsd-4 yet (e.g. cache flush
> routines don't have to run on P2 - so system time goes down quite a
> bit for e.g.  compile jobs).
> Another thing is that instead of rtk(4) it should be possible to use
> re(4) that supports 8139C+ chip found in landisk, which should get you
> better network perfromance, but last time I tried it )with my nfs-root
> usl-5p) it would wedge.  Unfortunately I didn't have time to
> investigate.
> > And BTW, the daily process seem to not build /landisk automatically.
> > Is this correct or did I miss the release ?
> Currently netbsd releng build farm only has amd64 machines.
> Unfortunately there's a bug in sh3 gcc that prevents it from compiling
> as a cross-compiler on 64-bit hosts, so all-64-bit releng farm can't
> build any of sh3 ports. :(

OK, so I'me gonna try -current, built from home :-)


Attachment: pgpl2EkSzyv9W.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index