Subject: Re: committing NetBSD/sh3 code
To: Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU>
From: None <>
List: port-sh3
Date: 09/14/1999 02:03:25
>>	There are various variants in Hitachi SH-3/4 family, so it is better
>>	be prepared.
>Sure. No argument on separating CPU support and system support.
>I thought Simon was asking how different the mmeye and the evbsh3
>were: do they need separate ports and separate kernels, or
>could/should we aim for one kernel that boots on both?

	I think have already gave us the answer.