Subject: Re: committing NetBSD/sh3 code
To: None <itojun@iijlab.net>
From: Jonathan Stone <jonathan@DSG.Stanford.EDU>
List: port-sh3
Date: 09/13/1999 10:00:32
>	There are various variants in Hitachi SH-3/4 family, so it is better
>	be prepared.

Sure. No argument on separating CPU support and system support.
I thought Simon was asking how different the mmeye and the evbsh3
were: do they need separate ports and separate kernels, or
could/should we aim for one kernel that boots on both?

Which is about the same thing I'm wondering about QED5xxx-core
handheld devices and the hpc port.