Subject: Re: What shall we do with the drunken disklabel?
To: None <CaptnZilog@aol.com>
From: Soren S. Jorvang <email@example.com>
Date: 07/02/2000 19:42:33
On Sun, Jul 02, 2000 at 11:33:29AM -0400, CaptnZilog@aol.com wrote:
> >> 0: root
> >> 1: swap
> >> 6: usr
> >> 7: volume body (similar to the NetBSD/i386 'c' partition.)
> >> 8: volume header (simple filesystem for boot loaders etc.)
> >> 10: whole disk (normal RAW_PART equivalent.)
> Is there any reason why we couldn't have partition 10 *and* partition 2 both
> be the same parameters (ie. both be the RAW_PART)? This way both sides of
> the fence would be happy...
That just leaves the question of what to do with the real on-disk