[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: MKSOFTFLOAT for evbppc
> On a P2020, a build.sh distribution for evbppc took 6.2% less time on a soft$
Please try to avoid paragraph-length lines.
> On a P2020, a build.sh distribution for evbppc took 6.2% less time on
> a softfloat userland .vs. hardfloat userland with kernel-emulation.
I'm not surprised there's a difference; they're basically doing the
same thing, except one of them is paying trap-to-the-kernel overhead.
I'm surprised the difference is that great; a build of the world must
be doing a lot more floating-point than I realized. Did you do
multiple runs to find out how the difference compares to the noise?
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse%rodents-montreal.org@localhost
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
Main Index |
Thread Index |