Subject: Re: major number unification?
To: Tim Rightnour <root@garbled.net>
From: Michael Lorenz <macallan@netbsd.org>
List: port-powerpc
Date: 11/28/2007 17:46:09
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello,

On Nov 28, 2007, at 17:31, Tim Rightnour wrote:

>
> On 28-Nov-2007 Michael Lorenz wrote:
>> I was thinking the same for a while but never got around to do
>> something about it.
>> Something like having powerpc/conf/majors.powerpc, have the
>> individual ports include it and just add port-specific stuff? I don't
>> see anything really macppc-specific in there btw.
>
> My fear with having port-specific stuff in separate majors files,  
> is that they
> will diverge again, thus requiring separate /dev's.  I'm actually  
> thinking we
> want a single majors.powerpc and everyone just uses that.

Yeah, I can't really think of anything port specific either.

>>> macppc has the most users and history, so perhaps we base it on
>>> that one?
>>
>> Fine with me.
>
> I'm willing to declare a flag day for prep.  As for bebox, mvmeppc,  
> ofppc, none
> of them really have users.  That mostly leaves the evbppc stuff,  
> which I'm not
> entirely sure what the status is as far as users.

Time to bug gimpy and simonb I guess. On the other hand they can  
switch whenever they want, just because majors.powerpc exists that  
doesn't mean they have to use it right away.

have fun
Michael
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)

iQEVAwUBR03vsspnzkX8Yg2nAQIIHQgAmwOdvAe4E4aVXGCiWL3Bnw97Ob7SQMFI
OodydxY6FeD214Bdo1jwKrTtR+JkmKbxa9ukrDj0VT3mAhKZylMZqzOcWau2aXzL
maE8MxypeSRi3/ihQouS06BMfOXzkG+taWCvN5Oa08c0lsFo9W33bW3sHykrB6a2
DyuO3dkJ+GEx9PMEnvyuyqiabRR2PuRiDIX8Ut+b+CR0HeshGEFyzNZp+5ODTrSO
NumnA8EMezkOVhNkaT/NdPKVlFEddvjxkWpD3ELQwLwT4vne5tdLwxK3Vo0/KrUW
npyDbD7ZwlJI6q1D4CpGGbTLSnuCG72dGriVb0wS4109UMbkuEZqOA==
=rIcd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----