In article <44146052.7080208@netbsd.org>
shige@NetBSD.org wrote:

> Is `gpgpio' good like as `gpiic'?

IMHO, if the "gp" prefix of "gpiic" means 405GP
(since it's in files.ibm405gp) and gpio (which is
defined in files.ibm4xx) is also available on other
4xx ppc processors, more generic prefix is better.
If gpio is available only on 405GP, the name "gpgpio"
seems okay but the declaration should be moved into
files.ibm405gp from files.ibm4xx.

(maybe we should ask simon or steve?)
---
Izumi Tsutsui