Subject: Re: IBM405GP/GPr OPB bus_space endian (powerpc/ibm4xx/dev/opb.c)
To: None <>
From: Shigeyuki Fukushima <>
List: port-powerpc
Date: 03/13/2006 02:54:26
Shigeyuki Fukushima wrote:
>>>  # On-chip GPIO controller
>>> -device	gpio { addr, [size = -1] }
>>> -attach	gpio at opb
>>> -file	arch/powerpc/ibm4xx/dev/gpio_opb.c	gpio
>>> +device	gpio_opb: gpiobus
>>> +attach	gpio_opb at opb
>>> +file	arch/powerpc/ibm4xx/dev/gpio_opb.c	gpio_opb
>> Underscore in a device name (i.e. "giop_opb0 at opb?" in config files)
>> looks weird a bit to me, and I'm afraid it causes some confusion.
>> Isn't "opbgpio" like epgpio for arm/ep93xx better?
> Other devices on IBM4XX have as same.
> We should change IBM4XX device naming rule at the same time.

I'm sorry. This is my misunderstangings.

Is `gpgpio' good like as `gpiic'?

Kind Regards,
--- shige
Shigeyuki Fukushima <shige@{FreeBSD,jp.FreeBSD,NetBSD}.org>