Subject: Re: Some PPC VM weirdness
To: Nathan J. Williams <email@example.com>
From: Jochen Kunz <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 02/19/2005 09:59:54
On 18 Feb 2005 18:18:53 -0500
"Nathan J. Williams" <email@example.com> wrote:
> > 0xd999ef40: at cpu_switchto+0x44
> In lines like "0xd999ef40: at cpu_switchto+0x44", the 0xd999ef40 is
> the frame address (on the stack), not a numeric representation of the
> instruction location.
OK, stupid user error.
But why are part of the addresses in the 0x00425xxx range and part in
> > There is some other VM interaction with ddb(4).=20
> No particular ideas here, I'm afraid. I'm suspicious of mapiodev() not
> setting any guard or cache flags, but it seems to work for other OEA
Hmmm. port-prep uses the same code but there it seems to work. The
43P-140, supported by port-prep, uses the same chip set / PCI host
bridge as the 43P-150 I am workin on. But port port-prep does some BAT
mapping also. Hmmmmm. This is subject to further investigation.