Subject: Re: A couple of suggestions
To: None <>
From: Derek God3 <>
List: port-powerpc
Date: 01/06/2004 10:09:59
Whilst we are on it, it would nice if "BOARDTYPE" were more visible
to the process. Why should my port/board's etc/etc.evbppc/*
distrib/evbppc/*, fdisk or disklabel be the same as somebody else's?
Perhaps subdirectories there would be more manageable - if only
BOARDTYPE were more visible.

-Derek wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 12:37:17PM -0500, Allen Briggs wrote:
>>>or CPPFLAGS+=-D__${MACHINE}__
>>I like this.  We already define __${BOARDTYPE}__ right now.  I'll poke
>>around and try to see where we currently use ${MACHINE} and fix them.
>>The only one that I can think of off-hand is sys/arch/isa/fd.c.
> Actually, after finding a couple of occurrences in sys/dev, I think
> it would be best to maintain consistency with the other ports that
> define ${MACHINE} and use 
> instead.
> -allen