Subject: Re: Repo-copy request: evbppc port for OpenBlockS266
To: Shigeyuki Fukushima <shige@NetBSD.org>
From: Matt Thomas <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 09/23/2003 13:18:31
At 08:42 AM 9/23/2003, you wrote:
>From: Eduardo Horvath <eeh@NetBSD.ORG>
>Subject: Re: Repo-copy request: evbppc port for OpenBlockS266
>Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 14:19:45 -0400
>I committed OpenBlockS266 specific sources and IBM4xx, IBM405GPx
>Would you like to review these commit?
> > > Ok. it should be named ibm40x_machdep.c.
> > > Is it better that ibm4xx_autoconf.c should also be named
> > > ibm40x_autoconf.c?
> > The walnut/autoconf.c file explicitly tweaks implementation
> > DCRs (CPC0_CR1 to be precise) which does exist on the 440GP.
> > However, these processors are also sold as cores only, so
> > I'm not certain how relevent this operation is to non-GP
> > parts. Maybe you should call this file ibm4xxGPx_autoconf.c?
>Ok, we use ibm4xxGPx_autoconf.c.
gp, not GP. all lowercase please.