Re: bzero.S and assym.h (Re: CVS commit: syssrc/sys/lib/libkern/arch/powerpc)

To: eeh%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: bzero.S and assym.h (Re: CVS commit: syssrc/sys/lib/libkern/arch/powerpc)
From: Izumi Tsutsui <tsutsui%ceres.dti.ne.jp@localhost>
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2001 09:45:51 +0900 (JST)

In article <20011201225442.20291.qmail%mail.netbsd.org@localhost>
eeh%netbsd.org@localhost wrote:

> You should not be depending on a statically defined CACHELINESIZE
> since that can vary between different CPU models.

I think libc version does not depend on static CACHELINESIZE,
but for libkern case, could single port have different CPU models
that have different cacheline size?
(sorry I'm not a powerpc guy)
---
Izumi Tsutsui
tsutsui%ceres.dti.ne.jp@localhost

References:
- Re: bzero.S and assym.h (Re: CVS commit: syssrc/sys/lib/libkern/arch/powerpc)
  - From: eeh

Prev by Date: #error Define CACHELINESHIFT for your CACHELINESIZE
Next by Date: Re: #error Define CACHELINESHIFT for your CACHELINESIZE
Previous by Thread: Re: bzero.S and assym.h (Re: CVS commit: syssrc/sys/lib/libkern/arch/powerpc)
Next by Thread: Re: bzero.S and assym.h (Re: CVS commit: syssrc/sys/lib/libkern/arch/powerpc)
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index