Subject: Re: how fast^H^H^H^Hslow?
To: Christophe Kalt <kalt@taranis.org>
From: Brian Willoughby <brianw@sounds.wa.com>
List: port-next68k
Date: 05/20/2002 16:14:19
Christophe Kalt asked:
> there's a NeXT sitting in a box in a dark corner near me, and
> i'm now wondering whether i should invest time to get NetBSD
> running on it. Not clear what model it is, it says "NeXTstation
> Turbo" (turbo? woo hoo, sounds fancy;), Model No N1100.
>
> so, how slow are these beasts?
For Unixy things, these machines are quite fast. NFS, NetInfo, sendmail and
such are fine. I do note that graphics can be slow, but I think NetBSD doesn't
really support much in the way of graphics?
I'm running NEXTSTEP 3.3 on a Turbo NeXTdimension, and I read my mail via
Mail.app on a daily basis. It's fast enough to keep me from switching to
something with fewer plug-ins available (like Mac OS X, which runs on my
PowerMacs).
David Wetzel <dave@turbocat.de> replied:
[ A NeXT Turbo has an 68040 at 33 MHz and PS2 Ram. It is noticeable
[ faster than a non-turbo (25MHz).
What's "PS2 Ram"? I do know that the Turbo NeXT added support for
column-addressed RAM access, which speeds up page faulting or any other
sequential memory access.
Like David, I have not set up a NeXT to run NetBSD yet. I think the easiest
way for me to do it is get a kernel image onto another machine served via tftp,
and netboot one of my older NeXT's rather than install NetBSD on a hard disk.
But, no time yet...
Brian Willoughby
Sound Consulting