In article <20051125140640.GA25276@thoreau.thistledown.com.au>
simonb@wasabisystems.com wrote:

> (which uses bus_space functions in it's ethernet driver) before took:
> 
>     350.520u 44.351s 6:58.84 94.2%  0+0k 0+0io 185pf+0w
>     349.663u 44.458s 6:59.13 94.0%  0+0k 0+0io 7pf+0w
>     349.797u 44.109s 6:56.85 94.4%  0+0k 0+0io 7pf+0w
> 
> and after took:
> 
>     351.099u 44.318s 6:58.40 94.5%  0+0k 0+0io 112pf+0w
>     351.480u 43.919s 6:57.58 94.6%  0+0k 0+0io 7pf+0w
>     351.205u 44.174s 6:54.45 95.3%  0+0k 0+0io 7pf+0w
> 
> So we've saved about 35kB of text for one kernel, about 12kB for another
> and any performance changes are statistical noise.

The %U and %P look a bit different? (just curious :-)

> I can't think of a reason not to apply this patch.  Can anyone else?

It's better to handle PR port-mips/31910 first?
(I have not check it yet though)
---
Izumi Tsutsui