Subject: Re: VM change for R4000
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Izumi Tsutsui <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 03/13/2005 12:40:12
In article <email@example.com>
> I have felt for a long time, that when mmap chooses a dynamic address
> for a
> vnode, it should use an existing mapped adress for that vnode, or
> choose a
> new address that has no other vnode mapped as text.
Choosing a new address doesn't help for virtual aliases on VIPT cache,
I think. What we have to do is to choose an address which have
the same VA index with existing mapped one, isn't it?