Oh, well.

> Here is a new version of the my proposition for introducing setregs_n32.
> It should address the indirection problem that was raised here.
>
> If nobody gets totally disgusted by this patch, I'd like to commit it soon,
> I'm getting some trouble to manage all the patches I have in my tree ;o)

OK, I put my objection here telling having "N32 emulation" in
NetBSD/mips is a mistake.  It's "N32 disguise."  IRIX never
implemented it in such the way.  And _please_, think seriously how
we exploit 64bit power of MIPS processors, rather than continuing to
morphing (spoiling?) NetBSD/mips.

Toru Nishimura