mhitch@lightning.msu.montana.edu wrote;

> I'm quite certain that mounting the root file system, which is done
> after cpu_configure() will save a non-spl0() SR value in the pcb, so doing
> anything in cpu_configure() would be lost anyway.

I'm going to fix the annoyance by inserting savectx() call just prior
to memcpy'ing of PCBs.  This would be a waste of CPU cycle comparing
to add a single line of value assignment.  Introduction of sysproc by
kthread damaged fork semantics somehow, I think.  Comment?

Tohru Nishimura