Subject: Re: puc based 16550 on macppc?
To: Joachim Thiemann <joachim.thiemann@gmail.com>
From: Michael Lorenz <macallan@netbsd.org>
List: port-macppc
Date: 04/18/2007 14:27:48
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello,

On Apr 18, 2007, at 12:56, Joachim Thiemann wrote:

> On 18/04/07, Michael Lorenz <macallan@netbsd.org> wrote:
>> > Do you want pcictl output as well?
>> Actually that's what I wanted.
>
> Oh, ok:
> PCI configuration registers:

Thanks :)

>    Base address register at 0x10
>      type: i/o
>      base: 0x0000fff8, not sized
>    Base address register at 0x14
>      type: i/o
>      base: 0x0000fff8, not sized

Still bogus but at least we know it's not the puc driver mucking things 
up. I'm beginning to wonder if OF correctly handles devices which 
hardwire the upper 16 bit in a used BAR to 0.
I also wonder why the PCI fixup code didn't program the interrupt 
register - it should have used whatever the bridge uses.
Are there other devices behind the bridge? Please mail me the complete 
ofctl -p output.

have fun
Michael
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)

iQEVAwUBRiZjJcpnzkX8Yg2nAQISpAf/ed7+f8Fr/NBh8YHZ67wAU2LDJPtd5RPL
3dluhrB4y1+9GXzbN3nT0QZPdCFcah7sHn2T6CnpSQVaIntPbCu0awRyOpnZj/+Y
49GZ5MmxMwhcQnijrlOR05qni8iQkglmLIicdI96J8cwP7I9WQaw/+j7HZIjDXpw
iP1N53TG3s2cJLs4JaNIoFuEOxk3Hkce1VxJc5hVeJFeli1Z9m7nQ9JVzXSzCdCq
4MUU12Dw0IanJOrM7hW6kHqTijullIyMgP7AMAWZEODYzdcjbEcHcWvSCzJnRNGX
WhXHajJKtH24u2c41zgt54wAOmXgGAUxomm8/YU5mhKLWF7DAjB6CQ==
=qvyg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----