Subject: Re: 2006Q3 bulk-built packages for 3.1_STABLE
To: Havard Eidnes <he@NetBSD.org>
From: Michael Lorenz <macallan@netbsd.org>
List: port-macppc
Date: 01/06/2007 14:34:37
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello,

On Jan 6, 2007, at 14:03, Havard Eidnes wrote:

> The bulk build framework ends up calling the directory for the
> packages for "powerpc", and I'm inclined to call the directory on
> the ftp server the same.
>
> Does anyone know of a good reason why I should not do that, and
> should instead use "macppc", since that's the architecture the
> packages were built on?

We already share a few install sets across all powerpc ports so that 
shouldn't be a problem.

> Anyone know if there exists architecture-specific packages in pkgsrc?

There are, for instance pkgsrc/sysutils/afbinit is strictly sparc(64). 
And all Xservers are hardware-specific to some degree ( they differ in 
details like the exact method to access PCI I/O space ) but that's 
probably not much of a concern on macppc.

have fun
Michael
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)

iQEVAwUBRZ/5zcpnzkX8Yg2nAQKDWwgAhDbn49eRJLWJhgPh+aKtVFzNpgOonXUQ
GkSW35oRB/HNvdE9pGQvgqAxsYv3LLcT5ec6EIcwPMPjrBku+8FrWhSZz/2422ry
4JwFUq45ux9GVBoSuONRzDfAbK6Adg79nrm9PUeD9S/4crhUWEzL7WjgiVUlYGp4
6bIMakEwY8n2tnORqCKcMMYMdhTl1jrOgEZ9O/Qrm5ElOnCq4cnmAX33dF8bvHkb
6+Aoq1wLtSgDHjuZqPW08uX8SPZY5weBlmP7zIm1dccYcbR2n9c5at4Uv9boLJru
dK9Fz/aUs+imp+LCZ7UGfyUWjvC/oQEn2KXcKCKLhC8naCYVnzb0Dg==
=TTFX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----