Subject: Re: Unofficial macppc 2.1 ISO for old world machines
To: Dave Huang <khym@azeotrope.org>
From: William Duke <wduke@cogeco.ca>
List: port-macppc
Date: 11/21/2005 13:54:20
> From: Dave Huang <khym@azeotrope.org>
> Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 12:43:15 -0600
> To: William Duke <wduke@cogeco.ca>
> Cc: port-macppc@NetBSD.org
> Subject: Re: Unofficial macppc 2.1 ISO for old world machines
> 
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 01:39:53PM -0500, William Duke wrote:
>> No specific reason, other than I haven't the need to go the extra mile.  I
>> did suggest ssh for others that might need the extra security.  For my
>> immediate needs, however, it's just unnecessary.
> 
> But my point is that it's not an "extra mile" :) It's the same amount
> of work to set NetBSD up as a telnet server as it is to set it up as a
> ssh server.

I meant the extra "security" mile.  I have no need for the extra security
since I'm on a closed network with virtually no chance of outside intrusion.
Let me rephrase that:  I'm on a closed network with only one user.  i.e. I'm
the only person that uses the machines on my network.  So, security like ssh
just adds extra load to already taxed 68k processors.

I suppose there's the performance argument.  Cleartext is processed much
quicker and requires fewer processor resources.