Tim Kelly <hockey@dialectronics.com> writes:

> 
> It may be tempting to look over the recently released Darwin code for
> Tiger, but I'd recommend against doing so.  Apple's APSL is not
> compatible with BSD licensing.  I believe it merely a matter of time
> before Apple starts applying legal muscle behind their
> license requirements on anything or anyone that could be
> competitive with Apple with code that might have come from Darwin.  A
> "cease-and-desist" order while the courts sort it out would be the first
> step, and I doubt NetBSD has the means to defend themselves in court.  
> 
> The best option is not contaminate any NetBSD code with code that even
> hints of being derived from Darwin.  Apple is in the business of making
> money, not open source operating systems.

There's no contamination from looking at code. Look all you want.

        - Nathan