At 5:52 PM -0400 4/10/05, Nathan J. Williams wrote:
> (It looks like pmap_subr.c should have the same problem in
>the -O0 case for the non-altivec pmap_zero_page and pmap_copy_page
>code, but empirically, it doesn't seem to be an issue. I'm not sure
>why not).

As I'd identified in my original post
(http://mail-index.netbsd.org/port-powerpc/2005/03/24/0000.html)
it is a problem in pmap - pmap_syncicache.

tim