On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 00:00:43 -0700
Chaz McGarvey <chaz@brokenzipper.com> wrote:

> 0 > 60c900 100 dump
> 0060C900: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 E0 A8 30
> 0060C910: 00 00 00 03 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> 0060C920: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 E0 A8 38 00 00 00 02
> 0060C930: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 E0 A8 40
> 0060C940: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 E0 A8 50
> 0060C950: 00 00 00 02 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> 0060C960: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> 0060C970: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> 0060C980: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> 0060C990: 00 E0 A8 74 00 E0 A8 7C 00 E0 A8 88 00 00 00 00
> 0060C9A0: 00 E0 AA 20 00 E0 0F 04 00 E0 0F DC 00 E0 0F F4
> 0060C9B0: 00 E0 55 88 00 E0 25 64 00 E0 28 A0 00 E0 29 0C
> 0060C9C0: 00 E0 29 F0 00 E0 2A 00 00 E0 2A 84 00 E0 16 60
> 0060C9D0: 00 E0 17 1C 00 E0 17 48 00 E0 17 94 00 E0 17 C0
> 0060C9E0: 00 E0 18 08 00 E0 30 E0 00 E0 34 EC 00 E0 33 34
> 0060C9F0: 00 E0 32 AC 00 E0 32 BC 00 E0 34 38 00 E0 36 AC ok

And now we know for sure you have ofwboot 1.10, and that there is a
mismatch between bootxx and ofwboot. All those "E0XXXX" values indicate
the executable was expecting to be loaded to 0xe000000, but as we can
see from the memory location, it was loaded to 0x600000.

Did you say that you got this from the 2.0 ISO available at NetBSD?

tim