At 10:54 AM -0500 12/12/04, Michael wrote:
>I think he means things like bonnie++ ( with a sufficiently large data
>set, at least 2*RAM ), transferring a couple of hundred MBs per (NetBSD's)
>ftp and so on.

This brings up a good point - should we work towards establishing some QA
benchmarks that we measure against whenever we feel we've hit a stable
point, beyond straight performance marks?

tim