In article <20040126174105.GC20602@netbsd.org>
wrstuden@netbsd.org wrote:

> On Sat, Jan 24, 2004 at 01:34:33PM +0900, Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
> > In article <20040123220357.GE15514@netbsd.org>
> > wrstuden@netbsd.org wrote:
> > > Yes. Well, we don't worry for a while. The change moves ofwboot.xcf's load 
> > > to E00000 or so (as I recall).
> > Anyone committed the change?
> Looks like not. You want to do it?

Well, I don't have enough time to work on NetBSD recently,
and I only tested the patch on my Apus (which had OF 2.0).
Does anyone test ofwboot.xcf on OF 3.x machines?
I'm a bit confused since some people say load-base or real-base
should also be changed.

> While we're at it, I think we can colapse RELOC and RELOC_FLATFILE into
> just RELOC.

I have no idea about this because I don't know the reason
why RELOC_FLATFILE was introduced...
---
Izumi Tsutsui
tsutsui@ceres.dti.ne.jp