> Nate Hill <vugdeox@freeshell.org> wrote:
> 
> > This sounds interesting. Darwin may eventually be the emulee of 
> > choice. Am I entirely wrong or does it seem that running the Darwin 
> > JVM (or any proprietary binary-only package) would be magnitudes 
> > easier than some "linux" binary package?
> 
> It depends what you call easy. Darwin userland is much less a mess than
> Linux. On the other hand, COMPAT_DARWIN may look simple, but it also
> require COMPAT_MACH and EXEC_MACHO, which are slightly more complicated
> (just peek at sys/compat/mach ...) 

	on a related topic, is there any work being done on kernel HFS+ support?

itojun