I really don't know what I was thinking posting this here.
But... now that it's here , let's  replace Open with Net.  What say the 
group now?

Andy Ruhl wrote:

>On Wed, 23 Jan 2002, SirStargazer wrote:
>
>>I have a Compaq Proliant 1600 (450PII 256 RAM RAID5) sitting next to a
>>Blue (off-green?) and white G3 (333 Mhz 128RAM OpenFirmware SCSI HD?) in
>>a lab.  The NT4 install on the compaq is about at its end.  Given that
>>OpenBSD will install on the G3? and the compaq, witch will support 35+
>>simultaneous users (+samba +netatalk +dhcpd no X server needed) better?
>>
>
>But this is a NetBSD list. You must mean NetBSD and not OpenBSD right?
>
>Both machines are good, but I'd liberate that memory and disk array from
>the Intel machine and use the Risc if it was me... If the disk array is
>internal, use the Intel box.
>
>Depending on what these users are doing, either machine should handle that
>kind of job witout much flinching.
>
>More memory is usually always better than less memory. I'd say the Apple
>will probably win the CPU horsepower contest though.
>
>Andy
>
>acruhl@sdf.lonestar.org
>SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org
>
>