Subject: Re: 'wdc0:0:0: lost interrupt' on tibook since PMAP changes
To: Markus W Kilbinger <kilbi@rad.rwth-aachen.de>
From: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@asim.lip6.fr>
List: port-macppc
Date: 06/21/2001 14:20:11
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 11:23:40PM +0200, Markus W Kilbinger wrote:
> >>>>> "Manuel" == Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.lip6.fr> writes:
>
> >> Attachment!? Couldn't find one...
>
> Manuel> Ops, sorry. Here it is
>
> Ok... 'time ./tst /dev/rwd0d 2000' was the call, rigth?
>
> Hmm, I get different results ranging from
>
> # time ./tst /dev/rwd0c 2000
>
> real 0m2.842s
> user 0m0.000s
> sys 0m0.663s
This would be 46MB/s, meaning the bus runs at Ultra/66
>
> and
>
> # time ./tst /dev/rwd0d 2000
>
> real 0m17.274s
> user 0m0.000s
> sys 0m0.667s
>
> The fastest counts?
Was the machine idle at the time you tested ?
This measure bandwith between the disks's cache and host memory. This is
only valid if there isn't any other disk access.
--
Manuel Bouyer, LIP6, Universite Paris VI. Manuel.Bouyer@lip6.fr
--