Subject: Re: Does NAT only work with PPP?
To: Mike Bush <info@thrill-inc.com>
From: Henry B. Hotz <hotz@jpl.nasa.gov>
List: port-macppc
Date: 01/19/2001 13:41:53
That was fast, and right on the money.  Works like a charm now.  I 
think I even remember something about this coming over the list 
before, now.

My thanks to all the multiple respondents.

At 1:42 PM -0600 1/19/01, Mike Bush wrote:
>Try: `sysctl -w net.inet.ip.forwarding=1` I don't use NAT anymore but I
>believe this is required. I could be wrong.
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Henry B. Hotz" <hotz@jpl.nasa.gov>
>To: <port-macppc@netBSD.org>
>Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 1:31 PM
>Subject: Does NAT only work with PPP?
>
> > macbsd# ipnat -l
> > List of active MAP/Redirect filters:
> > map rtk0 192.168.5.0/24  -> 137.78.218.53/32  portmap tcp/udp 40000:60000
> > map rtk0 192.168.5.0/24  -> 137.78.218.53/32
> > map rtk0 192.168.5.0/24  -> 137.78.218.53/32  proxy port ftp ftp/tcp
> >
> > List of active sessions:


Signature held pending an ISO 9000 compliant
signature design and approval process.
h.b.hotz@jpl.nasa.gov, or hbhotz@oxy.edu