Subject: Re: non-ofw kernels [was Re: NetBSD/G3 upgrade]
To: Dan Winship <danw@MIT.EDU>
From: Bill Studenmund <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 06/22/1999 13:52:57
On Tue, 22 Jun 1999, Dan Winship wrote:
> Why two different obios? Wouldn't we want just one obio with two
> different attachments, and let the attachment code do the necessary
> As for mainbus, it would have to logically be two completely different
> mainbusses, but I think you'd want to still call them both "mainbus".
Yes, and much cleaner. :-)
I had a chat w/ Jason after sending that, and that's about what he said.
He also suggested making it soemthing like:
bandit* at mainbus?
bart* at mainbus?
mpc* at mainbus?
pci* at bandit? bus ?
pci* at mpc?
nubus* at bart?
(bart was the name of the nubus controller on the 6100/7100/8100