Subject: Re: login incorrect or refused -- pam?
To: None <>
From: Tim & Alethea Larson <>
List: port-mac68k
Date: 01/14/2007 18:22:08
David Burgess wrote:
> If this is an upgrade from 2.x to 3.x, then yes, the pieces that do PAM
> are missing (/etc/pam*)
> I've found that, if I can rsh into the box from another system, I can
> usually install the PAM stuff remotely with rcp.

Yes, it is an upgrade, and an existing account (that had a password) 
that could not log in.  Are these pieces installed with base.tgz, so 
that it will be fine as soon as I unpack it?


Tim & Alethea