, <port-mac68k@netbsd.org>
From: William Duke <wduke@cogeco.ca>
List: port-mac68k
Date: 10/26/2005 17:34:45
Okay, I figured most of this stuff out. Neither of my two machines was
receiving mail because port 25 was closed on each machine. I think I
figured out my unqualified name problem too. At least everything appears to
be working properly now.
Man, this is addictive!
> I have a quick question regarding mail on a simple NetBSD network. Here's
> a description:
>
> I have two computers each running NetBSD 2.x., and I think I have everything
> setup properly for these two machines to connect to each other. I have
> configured /etc/hosts on both machines and both machines are running
> virtually identical (some of the commented lines are different) /etc/hosts
> files. My host /etc/host files look like this:
>
> 127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.
> 192.168.1.100 alpha
> 192.168.1.101 beta
> 192.168.1.1 router
>
>
> The names following the IP addresses is each machine's respective host name.
> Example: Computer with hostname of "alpha" is at IP address 192.168.1.100.
>
> I have also configured my /etc/rc.conf file so that it looks like this
> (rc.conf file on beta sets "beta" as the hostname):
>
> hostname="alpha"
> domainname=""
> defaultroute="192.168.1.1"
>
> Since it is just two computers networked to each other, is it really
> necessary to specify a domain name? The IP address 192.168.1.1 is my
> router.
>
> I have configured my /etc/resolv.conf file to look like this:
>
> nameserver 192.168.1.1
> lookup file bind
>
> I configured /etc/resolv.conf to use the address of my router as a
> nameserver. My router forwards dnsqueries to the nameservers of my ISP.
> Everything works flawlessly in this configuration.
>
> Okay, so here's the problem:
>
> When either computer boots and starts sendmail, I get an error message
> saying that the name (alpha), or (beta), as the case may be, can not be
> qualified. Also, when I use the mail utility to send a quick message from
> one computer (alpha) to the other (beta) the message is returned as
> undeliverable. Am I missing something here?
>
> If I telnet to alpha from beta, or vice versa, the name is resolved and the
> telnet connection is made. So what am I missing that is causing the big
> sendmail conundrum?
>
> Do I need to define a domain name and setup a local DNS server in order for
> these two machines to be able to send mail to each other? I was hoping
> that it wouldn't be necessary to do all of that.
>
> Any guidance will be greatly appreciated.
>
> Thanks,
>
> William
>
>