Subject: Re: religious spam
To: Lo'oRiS il Kabukimono <lo_oris@libero.it>
From: Michael G. Schabert <mikeride@mac.com>
List: port-mac68k
Date: 03/18/2003 09:43:39
At 12:25 AM +0100 3/14/03, Lo'oRiS il Kabukimono wrote:
>Noriyuki Soda <soda@sra.co.jp> :
>
>> - The person who had <goombaz@worldnet.att.net> stopped to use
>> world.att.net.
>[...]
>> - Then, Mr. Victor Gallardo have begun to use the same address
>> <goombaz@worldnet.att.net>.
>
>what a dumb provider... :/
Why would you say that it is a dumb provider? Any provider that
allows clients to choose their own username runs the risk of this
happening. That is why so many AOLers are stuck with foobar54386
names...because they do want to choose the names that others already
hold. I'm sure that ATT has a moratorium timeout on recycling
usernames, but it simply isn't as long as the bounce-unsubscribe for
the NetBSD list server. There is no way for the ISP to know whether
mail is supposed to be for the original holder of the username or the
new one.
Mike
--
Bikers don't *DO* taglines.