On Sat, 1 Jun 2002, dakidd wrote:

> <Pine.NEB.4.44.0206010841240.19620-100000@despair.immanent.net>
> > BTW, there seems to be another problem with current and 1.6A on 68020
> > and 68030 m68k's. If you run into the same problem that dakidd did
> > (FPU faults or illegal instructions), please try this:

> The 145 is interchangable with my 170 in all but two details: processor
> speed (the 170 is a tad faster) and FPU presence (170 has one, 145
> doesn't unless it's been upgraded)
>
> He's going to have the same troubles I had with the wscons stuff, and
> your "rip out the FPU fakery" attempt (which I've got downloading from
> the mail-server as I type this - let ya know what happens with it when I
> get it down and passed over to the PB) is probably going to fail for him
> completely due to the lack of a real FPU in the 145.

I see. I can make another one quickly with FPU_EMULATE plus the same
patch to cacheops. The fix for wscons is already in current and
1.6_BETA1 (and so should be in all the latest snapshots). Since Brian
said the "internal video was detected" I figured he had that -- but
maybe not. Brian, does that mean you got "intvid0", or just that it
printed the boot messages ?

Frederick