I'll second that.

I have an Asante Localtalk bridge (I don't remember
exactly what the product name was).  It's a little cigarette pack-sized
widget that has Ethernet on one side and Localtalk on the other.
I've used it to effectively give ethernet capability to my non-ethernet
machines/devices.  It seems to work flawlessly with filesharing and
printing.  Appletalk is all I've used, though so I can't say anything
about IP encap.

My file server (NetBSD 1.5.2 MacPPC) runs netatalk (asun 2.1.3), and
the appletalk file server also runs well.  (I don't use the printing)

-dgl-

>> NetBSD *can* support LocalTalk via any appropriate router.  These 
>> routers were frequently sold as printer-bridges (most recently when 
>> the iMac was introduced and lacked a LocalTalk-capable serial port). 
>> Even when advertised as single-device printer-only boxes they 
>> frequently actually support up to 4 computers doing AppleShare and 
>> even encapsulated IP traffic.  In other words, if you find one for a 
>> good price it's probably worth a try.
>
>I can personally attest this works perfectly (note that for MacIP
>DDP-encapsulated IP you need a LocalTalk bridge capable of this function).
>I have a IIci running 1.5.2 connected to a Dayna EtherPrint-T Plus bridge,
>which allows all the systems on the LocalTalk segment to connect to the
>IIci over AppleTalk and share files as well as the EtherTalk-connected
>printer. This Dayna isn't capable of MacIP routing, but I don't need those
>features, and for simple AppleTalk routing it works flawlessly for both
>bidirectional file sharing and printer services.
>
>-- 
>----------------------------- personal page: http://www.armory.com/~spectre/ --
> Cameron Kaiser, Point Loma Nazarene University * ckaiser@stockholm.ptloma.edu
>-- Two wrongs don't make a right, but they do make a great TV movie. ----------