On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, John Klos wrote:

> As it stands, the only m68k Linux binary I have doesn't appear to work
> yet;  I'm not sure if this is due to problems with the ABI translation,
> the need for Linux libraries, the fact that port-Amiga uses 8k pages...
> but I'm more concerned with getting the toolchain to self-build. Maybe
> Frederick might have a guess..

What goes wrong?

What does "file" say? A binary that was pointed out to me as a linux
binary was reported by "file" to be svr4. With COMPAT_LINUX plus
COMPAT_SVR4, it ran! I didn't bother to try with only one or the other.

Frederick