Subject: Re: Netatalk and Long Filenames
To: Kadari Mayson , gabriel rosenkoetter <gr@eclipsed.net>
From: Michael G. Schabert <mikeride@mac.com>
List: port-mac68k
Date: 11/19/2001 16:02:06
At 2:06 PM -0500 11/19/01, Kadari Mayson wrote:
>On 11/19/01 9:33 AM, "gabriel rosenkoetter" <gr@eclipsed.net> wrote:
>
>>  On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 08:02:47AM -0500, Kadari Mayson wrote:
>>>  Yes, use SAMBA, it's easier to set up anyway.
>>
>>  Uh... that's not much of a solution if all you've got as clients are
>>  macs.

And NetBSD has NFS built-in, while Samba must be installed separately 
(minor nit).

>
>Yes it is.  Mac OS X.1 comes with a built-in SMB client,

Which leaves the 20 million pre-G3 Macs out in the cold. As this is 
the port-mac68k list, I find it extremely likely that many of the 
users here cannot run OSX on all of their Macs (hence the original 
poster's mention of (1) OS8.6 and (1) OSX.

>  and you can upgrade to a professional level client/server solution 
>for X.1 with DAVE 3.1.  There is also DAVE 3.1 for OS 9 as well as 
>DoubleTalk 1.x.

If you consider paying 150 bucks to be a solution, then you've got 
more $$$ than I do :-). Also, for the same $149 retail, you can get 
MacNFS, also from Thursby ;-).

Mike
-- 
Bikers don't *DO* taglines.