Subject: Re: 640 x 400 displays
To: None <slumped@thekeyboard.com>
From: David A. Gatwood <dgatwood@deepspace.mklinux.org>
List: port-mac68k
Date: 10/09/2000 12:03:23
On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, David A. Gatwood wrote:

> >   DAG> (Me and my friendship with non-square pixels....)
> > 
> > You could have square pixels at any resolution, you would
> > just need to set the picture's aspect ratio appropriately.
> 
> Sure.  640x400 is 16:10, so had widescreen tubes (16:9) been common back
> then, it would have fit pretty well.  :-)

And of course, they did this on powerbooks....  Man, that's one
wide-looking screen on my 145....


David

---------------------------------------------------------------------
A brief Haiku:

Microsoft is bad.
It seems secure at first glance.
Then you read your mail.